Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Li Tu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs L. Tu

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

334

128

Best Rank

160

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$384.8K

Plays

Li Tu

AUS

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

334

128

Best Rank

160

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$384.8K

Plays

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 2 Tu

They have played 6 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Li Tu winning 4. The last match between Li Tu and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Yokohama Challenger, 22-11-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Li Tu getting the victory 6-0 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	1
Tu	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(QF) Yokohama Challenger(11-22-24)

Stats

Li Tu

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

(QF) Lincoln Challenger(08-09-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Li Tu

(SF) Lexington Challenger(08-03-24)

Stats

Li Tu

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

C. L. C. Wong vs L. Tu H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	L. Tu
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$384,840
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	60.41% (206-135)
1	Hard	2
2	Titles	10
1	Total H2H Matches	2
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	25.00% (1-3)

C. L. C. Wong vs L. Tu Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19% of points on their second serve, while Li Tu has won 48.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 45.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Li Tu has won 44.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.37% and 21.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Li Tu has saved 61.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Li Tu winning 42.50% (W/L 17/23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Li Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 143/85), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 20/17).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Li Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.10% of matches (W/L 8/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 times and Li Tu being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Li Tu winning 4.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu was at the Yokohama Challenger, 22-11-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Li Tu getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:15.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.39 while Li Tu has played against players with an average rank of 190.8.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Li Tu has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 34.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Li Tu has converted 23.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Li Tu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs L. Tu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	L. Tu
1	H2H Matches Won	2
2	Sets Won	4
22	Games Won	30
8	Aces (Total)	10
4	Total Double Faults	2
1:8:15	Average Match Time	1:8:15
65% (118/181)	1st Serve %	61% (81/133)
60% (71/118)	1st Serve Win %	70% (57/81)
43% (27/63)	2nd Serve Win %	58% (30/52)
55% (6/11)	Break Pts Won %	65% (11/17)
35% (46/133)	Return Points Win %	46% (83/181)
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Tu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Playford Challenger - 24-11-2025
R1 Jason Murray KublerJ. Murray	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Brisbane 3 Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Bernard TomicB. Tomic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati - 04-08-2025
Q3 Terence AtmaneT. Atmane	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Q1 James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	W	7-6(4) 6-4	Stats
National Bank Open - Toronto - 28-07-2025
Q3 Pierre-Hugues HerbertP. Herbert	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs L. Tu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	L. Tu
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	60.41% (206/135)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	58.62% (459/324)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	53.23% (3951/3472)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	62.72% (143/85)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	55.56% (25/20)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	58.06% (18/13)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	54.05% (20/17)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.45
1687	Aces Total	1639
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
603	Total Double Faults	718
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:21:27
371.13	Average Opponent Rank	371.85
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	61% (12005/19694)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	73% (8754/12005)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (4000/7689)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (800/1906)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	39% (7894/20224)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	42.11% (8/11)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	54.55% (6/5)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	55.56% (15/12)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	47.41% (64/71)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	75.84% (113/36)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	61% (206/336)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/5)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	54% (59/110)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (51/93)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (198/175)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (198/22)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (143/31)